The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On December 29, 2012, the Defendant: (a) sought a car from the parking lot in the welfare center for disabled persons located in the summer-gun, Young-gun, the Youngju-gun, which is located in the territory of the Republic of Korea; (b) sought a theft of the property inside the car; (c) sought to open a car from Cone Star Sheet, the victim D-owned car; (d) the victim’s car’s car’s E-ray car; (e) the driver’s seat and steering seat of the Gstststy car owned by the victim’s F-owned car; (c) did not open the door; and (d) tried to open the door of the victim’s Haststy or other car’s driver’s seat; (d) tried to open the door of the car with the victim’s H, but the Defendant did not commit an attempted attempt to flee by gathering a sound from the inside of the car.

2. As to the above facts charged, the Defendant did not have stolen things, but tried to open the door of the vehicle to avoid drilling, and the victim H’s vehicle only attempted to open the door to help because the interior of the vehicle turns on and did not have the intention of larceny, and this is examined whether the Defendant had the intention of larceny.

Witness

According to H’s legal statement, statement of H’s statement of statement prepared by the judicial police assistant, criminal record, etc., the Defendant attempted to open the above vehicle’s driver’s seat and the chief door, H’s attempt to open the vehicle’s seat and the chief door, the fact that the Defendant was about to open the driver’s seat by approaching the vehicle, and that the Defendant was about to cross the driver’s seat on several occasions. However, even though such fact alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the Defendant had the intention to larceny, and there is no other obvious evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the above facts charged constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the court acquitted the defendant pursuant to the latter part of Article 325