logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2016.06.16 2016고단59
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving two cargo vehicles from C.

On January 21, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 18:03, and proceeds from the intersection in front of the Simsan Agricultural and Industrial Complex at the Geumsung-si, Geumsung-si, Geumsung-si, a gold-si, from the jurisdiction of the Simsan-dong, to the gold-free area, and continued to turn to the left at the Myeon of the ledger.

At all times, there is a left turn and there is a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving safely, such as not making a non-protective left turn, if the defendant is likely to obstruct the normal passage of other vehicles in the opposite lane and driving on the intersection with a signal apparatus.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to look at the opposite lane properly and failed to turn left the opposite lane, and caused the part of the victim's ES5 car driving in front of the left-hand part of the EM5 car driven by the victim D(48 SM5 SM5 S) which was proceeding in accordance with the new code from the gold-side room to the front-hand part of the driver's freight.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as crypum dump, which requires treatment for about 20 days by occupational negligence as above.

2. A defendant who violates the Road Traffic Act (refluence of alcohol measurement) drives a vehicle with a blood color red, light, and walked off at the F District of the Incheon Police Station of the 79 Cheongcheon-si, the blue-si, and the walking distance;

Due to reasonable grounds to determine a person, he/she was requested from 18:35 to 18:55 on the same day to respond to the measurement of alcohol by inserting the whole in a measuring instrument of drinking from G three times on the same day.

Nevertheless, the defendant refused this and did not comply with a police officer's request for a measurement of drinking without any justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement with D 1.

arrow