beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and for one year and six months.
However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendants A, in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, are those engaged in driving of the D Poter Cargo, and Defendants B are those engaged in driving of the E rocketing car.
Defendant
A On January 6, 2015, the intersection of G gas station located in 15:50 at the net city of 15:50,000, driving the above cargo vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.141% in blood, and making the left-hand turn to the right-hand turn at the one-lane level of the two-lanes in the right-hand village in the right-hand side.
Since there is a three-distance intersection with signal apparatus and a non-protective left-hand turn, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed of entering the intersection when intending to turn to a non-protective left-hand turn, and to proceed with a safe method so as not to obstruct the proceeding of the opposite vehicle after making a good examination of whether there is a vehicle going to a non-protective left-hand turn in the opposite part.
On the other hand, Defendant B driving the said car at the same time and place as above, and led the said intersection to a speed of 80 to 90km each hour along the two-lanes from the sloping surface to the sloping surface.
Since there is a three-distance intersection with a signal apparatus and a non-protective left-hand turn, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to look at the front side and left-hand side, to reduce the speed before entering the intersection, to accurately operate the steering and steering system, and to turn-hand turn in the opposite side, and to proceed in a safe way in accordance with the passage signals.
Nevertheless, Defendant A neglected this and thereby obstructed the progress of Defendant B’s above-run car, which was directly engaged in the normal signal in the opposite line to the opposite line of the opposite direction of the course, in order to make a left-hand turn to the right-hand turn at the straight line of both directions, and Defendant B.