The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the finding of guilty of the facts charged in this case, and thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment, although the defendant did not know the victim B's drinking.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case was around 19:05 on April 11, 2012, the Defendant, without waiting at the taxi platform in the front of Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, and demanded the victim to move the vehicle to the taxi platform because the vehicle was waiting in the vicinity of the above place without waiting at the taxi platform. However, the Defendant was able to say that “the width and the width will get on the taxi platform.”

The Defendant spits or spits the victim's face on a taxi for the foregoing reasons, and spits or spits the victim's left head at one time and puts down two pressures and heats on the left side of the victim's left head.

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by comprehensively taking account of the following evidence.

C. The judgment of the court below can be accepted by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below, i.e., ① the victim statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court below that the defendant had consistently taken the part of the victim’s left head (Evidence No. 21, No. 46 of the evidence record, No. 36 of the trial record), ② the victim’s body part of the victim’s left head that he was faced with the defendant according to the image of the damaged photograph taken immediately after the crime of this case. ③ The victim suffered two pressures and heat injuries on the left side of the victim G prepared following the crime of this case (hereinafter the crime of this case) but the victim stated that the damaged part was the victim’s statement that the damaged part was the food on several occasions.