logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2015.11.27 2015누5697
영업정지처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds for the plaintiff's assertion in the trial while filing an appeal is not significantly different from the contents of the plaintiff's assertion in the first instance court, and the judgment of the first instance court rejecting the plaintiff's assertion is justified even if both evidence submitted in the first instance court and the purport of the entire pleadings in the first instance court and the first instance court are examined.

Therefore, the court's explanation on this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the dismissal of some contents as follows. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

The judgment of the court of first instance = 1,065,50,904 won = 2,330,847,955 won = 1,065,50,904 won = 2,330,847,955 won = 1,265,904 won = 1,330,845 won - 1,265,347,051 = Non-performing debt = 600,00 won - 181,142,869 won for non-performing debt reduction - 181,40,000 won for non-performing debt reduction - 60,000 won for non-performing debt reduction - 60,000 won for non-performing debt - 1,500,000 won for non-performing debt - 1,50,000 won for non-performing debt - The defendant's new violation of the first instance court's capital reduction in light of ".

arrow