1. The Defendant’s KRW 72,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from August 26, 2015 to December 21, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. In addition to the purport of the entire pleadings as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the plaintiff lent the name of Eul, a real estate consulting firm, around Sep. 26, 2013, to be removed by the Seoul Metropolitan City urban planning, the company of this case on behalf of the plaintiff in the business of purchase and sale, promotion of compensation, etc., and on behalf of the plaintiff in the business of selling and selling the above real estate and paying KRW 125,00,000 to the company of this case on or before that time, the company of this case paid KRW 110,00,000 to the company of this case as a director of the company of this case, and the company of this case recognized the difference between the defendant and the above 125,00,000 won out of the compensation amount expected to be removed by the contract of this case on or before 100,000, the company of this case was not entitled to return the remaining amount to the defendant as 100,000 won out of the compensation amount of this case.

B. Therefore, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is entitled to KRW 72,00,000 ( KRW 80,000,000) for the Plaintiff pursuant to the instant agreement and the end of April 2015.