1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 24,654,50 for the Plaintiff and its related KRW 5% per annum from August 7, 2017 to December 30, 2017; and (b) December 31, 2017.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff was the former owner of a building without permission on the D ground in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu (hereinafter “instant building”).

B. The Defendant granted the right of representation to E to purchase the right to move into the Seoul Metropolitan Government when the instant building is removed.

B. On October 16, 2014, the Plaintiff concluded a sales contract between E and E with the purchaser of the instant building as “E and one other.” The Plaintiff agreed to continue to lease and use the said building until the said building is removed due to the special terms and conditions of the said sales contract, and the Plaintiff agreed to receive compensation for the removal of the building.

The details of the above special agreement are as follows:

Jeonse tax is KRW 25,000,000.

(Japan0 million won is the deposit for lease on a deposit basis, and one of which is the payment for compensation). In lieu of receiving the entire compensation even if the amount of compensation out of the deposit for lease on a deposit basis is less than (00 million won) the entire amount of compensation, it is a condition that the Seoul Special Metropolitan City is the scheduled house for the removal of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City and the right to live in the area of

(The contract for purchase and sale only of the right to move into the 33th square meters for the removal of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City). The buyer shall be a joint and several surety.

(Standards for existing unauthorized buildings). The name shall be third persons.

C. On November 24, 2014, between E and E, the Plaintiff newly prepared a sales contract with the purchaser as to the instant building (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) with a copy of the Defendant’s seal imprint certificate, seal imprint certificate, and resident registration certificate, and affixed the Defendant’s seal imprint on the said sales contract.

In addition, with respect to the above building on the same day, the plaintiff and E also prepare a lease contract in which the plaintiff and the tenant are the representative of the plaintiff, F, and the lease deposit amount of KRW 25 million. The above lease contract has a seal other than the defendant's seal imprint, and the above is affixed.