logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.06.19 2014나2039365
회생채권조사확정재판에대한이의
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

The reason why this Court, which has accepted the judgment of the first instance, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal of each corresponding part as follows. Thus, this Court shall accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second loan agreement of this case is "the first loan agreement of this case" in 16 and 17 of the third decision of the court of first instance.

The fifth 19th 19th 19th 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be read as "non-samping".

Each "the rights and obligations specified in the instant special agreement and the revised special agreement" shall be construed as "the rights and obligations specified in the instant loan agreement and the fund supplement agreement" in accordance with the 6th sentence and 19th sentence of the first instance judgment.

The defendant in the 6th sentence of the first instance court's ruling "the defendant" in the 18th sentence shall be "the plaintiff".

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and all appeals by the plaintiff against the defendants are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow