1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The Plaintiff’s total costs of litigation.

1. Basic facts

A. This court’s reasoning is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance except for the addition as follows. Thus, this court’s reasoning is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(b)in addition, paragraph 1 of title 3 is added to paragraph 3, paragraph 3, 19, and paragraph 2 below is added to paragraph 4, 8.

1) On the 10.2th of October, 10, the Administrator of the Korea Food and Drug Administration shall provide the buyer with the 10.0th of the 10th of the 10th of the Goods to the seller, with the 10th of the 14th of the 10th of the 10th of the Goods to the seller, with the 1st of the 1st of the 10th of the Goods to the buyer, with the 1st of the 10th of the 1st of the goods to the buyer, the 1st of the goods to the buyer and the 1st of the goods to the buyer. The 1st of the goods to the buyer to the 1st of the goods to the buyer, the 1st of the goods to the buyer to the 1st of the goods to the buyer, and the 1st of the goods to the buyer to the 1st of the goods to the buyer, the 1st of the goods to the buyer to the 1st of the goods to the buyer.

2. Determination as to the claim for the unpaid construction cost

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1 by the parties concerned completed all of the instant construction works, but the Defendant’s total construction cost of the instant construction contract was 3,614,00.