logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.07.10 2019가단8835
자문용역비
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 16, 2006, the Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City B was designated and announced as a zone for the redevelopment and improvement of D houses as a public announcement of Gyeonggi-do on January 16, 2006, and on January 24, 2006, the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City designated the Korea National Housing Corporation (hereinafter “Defendant”) as the project implementer of the D Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project (hereinafter “instant project”) under Article 8(4)4 and (5) of the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “instant project”) by combining with the Korea Land Corporation on October 1, 2009, and notified it as the E public announcement of Sung-nam Special Metropolitan City.

B. A provision regarding the payment of operating expenses (hereinafter “implementation agreement”) out of the “Agreement on Implementation of Housing Redevelopment Projects in the Area D zone in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “the representative meeting at that time”) concluded with the resident representatives’ meeting (F at the time the chairperson F; hereinafter “the representative meeting of the case”), which was established by the Defendant for the instant project on June 2006, is as follows.

Article 8 (Operation and Cooperation of Resident Representative Organization) (1) "A (Representative Meeting of this case)" may present its opinion on the important matters of the project to "B" (Defendant).

(3) B shall provide offices until two months after the date of public announcement of transfer of the project’s completion for the smooth operation of resident representatives’ meetings, and assist A with operating expenses incurred in performing activities on behalf of residents, not exceeding 18 million won per month;

C. On November 22, 2007 and January 2008, the Plaintiff, a company engaged in specialized management business, etc., entered into a service contract with the representative meeting of this case and for consultation and consultation related to the project of this case, one million won per month (excluding value-added tax). The Plaintiff’s G, upon which the right holder’s share of the land, etc. of this case has been reduced due to the Plaintiff’s G, would be paid 10% of the reduced amount (hereinafter “instant service contract”).

At the time, the plaintiff and the representative meeting of this case are the defendant.

arrow