logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.11.30 2015구합65385 (1)
주거이전비 등의 청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant shall provide the plaintiffs with the corresponding funds stated in the attached Table in the "total amount of relocation expenses and directors' expenses."

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) The formulation of a rearrangement plan and the designation of a rearrangement zone - The Authority for designating: the Seongbuk-Namnam City - the date of public announcement: January 21, 2008 - The name of the project: the project: Seongbuk-Nam A housing redevelopment improvement project, the Sungnam B housing redevelopment improvement project, and the Sungnam C housing redevelopment improvement project (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "each improvement project of this case");

(b) Authorization for project implementation - Location and size (1) - Sungnam A rearrangement project: D 203,973 square meters: 203,000 square meters in Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, Jungnam-si, and 108,524 square meters in Seoul-nam-si (hereinafter referred to as "each improvement zone in this case"): Public notice - ① Public notice of 233,366 square meters in total (hereinafter referred to as "each improvement zone in this case"): G G (2) improvement project in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, on December 4, 2009: H (3) improvement project in Sungnam-nam C: project in Sungnam-si on December 4, 2009; (1) project implementer in Sungnam-si: the project implementation period: the project implementer in Sungnam-si; the purpose of public notice of authorization for the implementation of the project; and (1) through (1) the entire number of pleadings is without dispute.

2. The attachment to the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes shall be as follows;

3. Determination as to the cause of action

A. In full view of the overall purport of arguments as to the statements in Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 7, 8, 10 through 20, 22 through 24, 27, 29, 30, 32 through 52, 54 through 61, 63 through 71, 75 through 81, and 83 through 108, the plaintiffs can recognize the fact that the plaintiffs formed each of the corresponding family members indicated in the "head of household" column in the "head of household" column in each of the relevant rearrangement zones as at the date of the public inspection and announcement of each of the rearrangement projects in this case, and resided as tenants for not less than three months.

According to the above facts, the defendant has a duty to pay the plaintiffs the amount corresponding to each of the above amounts (hereinafter "the principal of this case") stated in the "total amount of housing relocation expenses and director's expenses" under the related Acts and subordinate statutes, unless there are special circumstances.

B. The Plaintiffs objection to the principal of the instant case.

arrow