logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2018.12.10 2018고합26
사문서위조등
Text

In regard to the crimes No. 1 and No. 2 in the judgment of the defendant, a fine of KRW 500,000 shall be imposed on the crimes No. 3 in the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the head of Gyeongnam Development Group C.

1. On May 24, 2018, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) was in possession of the Defendant’s house located in W, 08:00, at the Defendant’s office located in W, without the consent of the said C resident E;

On June 13, 2018, the 7th simultaneous local election campaign report was carried out on June 13, 2018, stating as “E”, “E”, “E”, “E”, “E”, “E”, “E”, and “E”, respectively, in the column of the reporter’s column, the 7th simultaneous local election campaign report using a black pen, and the name of the householder’s name in the main column using a black pen, and indicated as “E”, “W”, “E”, “E”, and “E” in the column of the reporter’s name. The reason for the report was indicated as “W”, “A person who is unable to move freely due to a serious physical disability due to a physical disability due to a physical handicap of the reporter’s name.

The report on residence voting in the name of E, including the forgery of one copy of the written report on residence voting in the name of E, was prepared in the same manner as that of the attached list of crimes on the same day.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant, without authority, committed each of five copies of the residence voting report in the name of five, such as E, which is a private document related to rights and duties.

2. On May 24, 2018, the Defendant: (a) submitted five copies of the forged abode voting report to the public official in charge of Franchising Franchising the name of the Franchising Office, as in paragraph (1), at the Franchis Office located in the JJ of Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam Development-gun; and (b) held each of them.

3. No person who violates the Public Official Election Act shall report a false abode voting;

Nevertheless, the defendant submitted five copies of the forged abode voting report to the public official in charge of F-Myeon Office who is not aware of the forgery at the same time and place as the above paragraph 2, and made a false abode polling report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written confirmation or telephone confirmation;

1. A written accusation;

1. A copy of a report on residence voting;

arrow