Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won and by imprisonment of 4 months for each of the defendants B.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A’s main point of “F” operated by the victim E in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City on December 17, 2016, at around 19:35, at the point of “F” operated by the victim E, and Defendant B, a person who was engaged in drinking together, did not deduct the amount paid by Defendant B from the amount paid by the victim, while asserting that he did not deduct the amount paid by the victim, and for about 50 minutes, whether Defendant A received any money;

Chewing, bitch bitch bitch bitch, which is “the same as a bitch bitch bitch bitch,” and which caused customers who drink at the main place of week to leave the place, thereby obstructing the victim’s main business by force.

2. On December 17, 2016, at the front of the main point indicated in paragraph 1, around 20:25, Defendant B sent to the Defendant after receiving a report that Defendant A, a first executive officer, is suffering from disturbance as stated in paragraph 1, and thereby, Defendant B arrested Defendant A as an offender in the act of committing a crime, and the G District guard of the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Police Station arrested Defendant B as an offender, the G District guard of the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Police Station arrested Defendant B, who attempted to board the Defendant A at the patrol, and assault Defendant B by fasting and blocking H’s breast part of his chest due to a defect that he attempted to take on the patrol, and then, he re-entered the situation of the death, such as G District guard of the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Police Station G District, which listened to the death, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties relating to the prevention, suppression and investigation of the crime, by assaulting Defendant A and selling.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of a witness I, H, E, J, and K;

1. Some statements concerning the Defendants in the police interrogation protocol

1. Each police statement made to I, H, and E;

1. The investigation report [Defendant B denies the crime, however, according to each of the evidence stated in the judgment, considering the following facts: (a) the police officer I and H have consistently made a detailed and consistent statement concerning the crime of this case from the police investigation stage to the police investigation stage to the present court; and (b) the witness K's statement also corresponds to I and H's statement, the Defendant is a police officer as stated in the facts charged.