logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.06.09 2017고단1269 (1)
모욕
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On December 23, 2016, the summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) in front of the roof breabbbbbbing b, which is located in the south Korean War, around 19:25 on December 23, 2016, and under the trade name of “D” operated by C, the Defendant received 112 reports and dispatched to the site and conducts on-site investigations in order to grasp the circumstances of the case at the location where the reporter and his/her work, Defendant’s work, etc. are located; and (b) the police officer belonging to the Seo-gu Police Station E District, who conducts on-site investigations, is the victim F.

“Peeped”, “Peeped” between the second fingers and the third fingers in a strict manner, and “Peeped.”

The term “I am, Chewing Ma.” The victim’s warning refers to “I am. I am. I am.” again to the warning victim, “I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. am. I am. I am. I am am. I am. I am am. I am. I am am. I am. I am am. I am am. I am am. I am. I am am. I am. I am. I am. I am. am, I am you am., I am, I am, I am. I am, I am. I am, I am. I am. I am. am, I am you

2. The above facts charged constitute a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only upon a complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. The victim F agreed with this Court on June 1, 2017, which was the date of the instant indictment and decided not to file a civil or criminal complaint.

“A” is recognized as having submitted a written agreement containing the indication.

Since the intent of the victim indicated in the above agreement is to revoke the complaint against the defendant, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow