1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the part of the judgment of the first instance except for an additional determination as to the matters newly asserted by the plaintiff in the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the same time as stated in the reasoning for the judgment at the trial at the trial at the court at the same time. As such, it

2. Additional determination

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the Defendant did not deliver to the Plaintiff a copy of the request for disciplinary decision and a copy of the resolution related to the instant disposition. Accordingly, the instant disposition was procedural errors in violation of the provisions of Articles 9 and 18 of the Fire Officials Decree.

B. Article 9(4) of the Enforcement Decree of the Fire Officials Act provides that “The person entitled to request a resolution of disciplinary action, etc. shall, at the same time as the request for a resolution of disciplinary action, etc., send a copy of the request for a resolution of disciplinary action or the imposition of disciplinary surcharge to the person subject to deliberation, such as disciplinary action,” and Article 18(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the Fire Officials Act provides that “The enforcement of disciplinary action, etc. shall be conducted by issuing a copy of the written resolution to the person subject to the resolution,

In full view of the purport of Gap evidence 3, Eul evidence 2-1, and Eul evidence 2-2, the plaintiff can recognize the fact that the plaintiff received a copy of the defendant's request for disciplinary action on September 8, 2015, a statement of grounds for execution of disciplinary action (the explanation of grounds for disciplinary action) and a copy of the resolution on disciplinary action on September 21, 2015 (the plaintiff is deemed to have submitted Gap evidence 3 while filing the lawsuit in this case). The plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

On the other hand, the plaintiff seems to have asserted that the written request for disciplinary decision, etc. that he received is not related to the instant disposition, but the name and number of the official document (Evidence A No. 3) submitted by the plaintiff as evidence.