logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.06.22 2017고단1549
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in Cart XG.

On March 18, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 03:40 on March 18, 2017, and led to D's front road in Jung-gu Seoul to the upper wing-do from the side of the Green Hospital.

Since there is no signal apparatus, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a cross-vehicles by reducing speed or temporarily stopping the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and received the part of the F. E.L. XG car in front of the left-hand side of the E.R. car from the driving of the Defendant to the left-hand side of the E.L. car from the driving direction due to negligence.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim G (28) who was on board the said rocketing car due to the above occupational negligence, such as cerebral roin in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment. The Defendant suffered injury to the victim H (V, 43 years of age) who was on board the said Trax XG car, including dump dump dump for which medical treatment is required for about two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of each traffic accident in E, H, I, and G;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to G and H

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case was committed during the suspended execution period for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, but the defendant faithfully follows the direction of the protection observation officer, the victim's injury is relatively minor, the victim's damage is likely to be compensated to a certain extent due to subscription to liability insurance, and the victim's injury is likely to be compensated.

arrow