The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. On September 2, 2016, the Defendant filed an appeal with the Defendant: (a) the Defendant returned to a stop and a bus in a rest area, and (b) the Defendant: (c) the Defendant reads “fluor if there is any misunderstanding” to the Defendant; and (d) the Defendant was fluoring the Defendant’s fluor; and (c) the Defendant did not place the damaged person in the event of the Victim’s chest or the Defendant’s fluoring of the right eye at the rest of the rest area; and (c) the Defendant did not place the damaged person into a pool.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, in particular the diagnosis and damaged photographs, the victim suffered from the injury of the closed throke, the closed throke, the closed throke, the stoke, and the other stoke and the open stale of head (e.g., e., e., e., e., e., g., e., e., g., e., e., e., g., e., g., e., e., g., e., e., g., e., e., e.,

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.