The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. On February 15, 201, when serving as an employee, the Defendant: (a) stolen four handphones owned by the victimO on February 15, 201 and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2 million on September 7, 2011; (b) but, (c) went away from the above company; (d) did not return the entrance card; and (e) did not return the entrance card, and (e) did not return it to the transfer store at night; and (e) did not have the nature of the crime; (b) the Defendant transferred the means of access to electronic financial transactions; (c) the Defendant was also aware of the fact that the crime was abused for another crime; (d) there is a high risk that an unspecified number of victims should be punished for the crimes; (e) the Defendant was punished for the crimes related to the crime; and (e) the Defendant had no criminal power to return the entrance card; and (e) the Defendant did not appear to have any special circumstances, circumstances and circumstances leading to the Defendant’s new sentencing or changes in circumstances following the lower judgment.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.