Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person driving a CF car.

On September 23, 2014, the Defendant driving the said vehicle as his business on September 23, 2014, while driving the said vehicle at a speed of the US-do Busan metropolitan bank at a speed of the U.S. and driving the crosswalk at the front of the Busan metropolitan bank at the speed of the U.S. at the speed of the U.S. Do.

Since there are crosswalks in which signal lights are installed on the front door, in such cases, the driver engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check whether there is a person who gets on a road by reducing speed and by checking well the right and the right and the right of the road, and to drive safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, due to negligence, disregarding that the vehicle driving signal is a stop signal, the victim D (the age of 27) was not found to walk the crosswalk from the side of the Gwangju Bank by walking signal to the new apartment, and the victim was sent to the right side of the defendant's vehicle, instead of finding the victim D (the age of 27).

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as the extension of the left-hand side requiring medical treatment for about four weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for detention in the workhouse have been agreed with the victim after the prosecution of this case. The victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, the vehicle of the defendant can be somewhat helpful for the recovery of damage to the victim due to the purchase of a motor vehicle comprehensive insurance policy, and the defendant has no record of committing the crime at all, etc. shall be determined as per the order.