A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

On September 10, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment due to a violation of road traffic law (drinking driving) at the Gangseo branch court of the Chuncheon District Court on September 10, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Gangnam prison on March 8, 2016.

1. On July 15, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 to a fine of KRW 1.5 million by the above court due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. on July 15, 2009; on April 27, 2010, the above court issued a summary order of KRW 3 million by a fine due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act; on August 29, 2013, the above court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months by imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act; and on September 10, 2015, the above court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months by imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On April 13, 2017, around 21:00, the Defendant driven C Poter truck with alcohol level 0.257% while under the influence of alcohol level 0.257% while under the influence of alcohol level 0.257% at a section of approximately 160 km, from the west-si, Gangwon-do, the west-si, Gangwon-do, Seoul-do, to the 405 Vung-si Intersection.

As a result, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver's license.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of C Poter trucks in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.

The defendant driving of the above cargo at the time of the day specified in paragraph 1, which led to the course of 7th national highways from the original Maart Intersection in the vicinity of 405 to the main city of Gangseo-gu.

At that time, there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by temporarily stopping the vehicle before entering the intersection, because the red on-and-off signal was installed.

Nevertheless, the defendant.