beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant had attempted to borrow money by creating a collateral security right on the real estate owned by his husband, as if he had the right to dispose of the real estate owned by B.
1. On October 27, 201, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) around October 27, 201, the Defendant: (b) ordered the head of the office of a certified judicial scrivener office, who knows the fact, to delegate the act related to the application for registration, to the head of the office of a certified judicial scrivener office, which is located in Gyeonggi-gu Gyeonggi-gun C; (c) indicted the F Prosecutor’s Office of Gyeyang-gun to “H” in the indication column of the real estate in the proxy form printed on the printed letter; (d) it appears to be “F” to be a clerical error in the indication column of the real estate; (e) there is no concern that the Defendant’s exercise of the Defendant’s right to defense; (c) thereby, corrected it ex officio; (d) stated B’s seal in the column of the person liable for registration, “B”, and “G” in the name of the person liable for registration; and (d) continuously,
B’s seal was affixed to the name of the proprietor of the right to collateral security, stating “G” and “B” in the column of the proprietor of the right to collateral security, and the said B’s seal was affixed.
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged each letter of delegation and mortgage contract in the name of private document B, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.
2. On October 27, 2011, the Defendant: (a) had a public official in charge of registration under his/her name, who knows that he/she was forged, submit a forged power of attorney and a document establishing a collateral security agreement to the public official in charge of registration under his/her name, and held the same respectively as if he/she were duly formed.
3. The Defendant made false entry in the authentic copy of a notarial deed at the same date and time as in paragraph (2) above, and at the same place, the establishment registration of a neighboring mortgage based on the contract concluded by October 27, 201 in the G regarding the said real estate.