logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.08.08 2013고단3301
상표법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and three months.

Seized evidence 1 to 3 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 26, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Trademark Act, etc. by the Seoul Central District Court. On December 2, 2010, the Daegu District Court sentenced 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Trademark Act and the Food Sanitation Act and completed the execution of the sentence on February 6, 2012 at the Kimcheon Juvenile Reformatory.

No one shall use a trademark identical with the registered trademark of another person on the designated goods or similar goods, or use a trademark similar to the registered trademark of another person on the designated goods or similar goods, and any person who intends to conduct food subdivision business shall report it to the competent authority.

Nevertheless, the Defendant purchased a Chinese party in China and supplied it to a double-sea subdivision factory, C performs the overall control over financing, subdivision, distribution, D, E, F, G, subdivision work, H, and I share the role of supplying a fake scoping scoping scoping scoping scoping scoping scoping, and J, without reporting to the competent authorities, tried to subdivide a local party into one of the designated goods, and sell it by packaging it with a registered trademark of scoping Co., Ltd. or any similar trademark on the designated goods.

On October 26, 2012, from around 200 to Haman on January 2013, 2013, the Defendant subdivided the front door of China into 1kg, and then sold 3,900 ambling 12,000 amblings at the market price, where the trademark of the same shape as the registered trademark of the owner of the trademark right is marked on the front door, and where the trademark of the same shape as the registered trademark of the owner of the trademark right is marked.

Accordingly, in collusion with C, the defendant used a trademark identical to the registered trademark for goods identical with or similar to the designated goods, and operated a food subdivision business without reporting it to the competent authorities.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.

arrow