logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.02.13 2013고정231
모욕
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B: (a) around 17:30 on July 10, 2012, on the grounds that the victim E did not have the same part of the same party in relation to the election of the chairman of the Council at the plenary session of the Daejeon Central Council, the Defendant, at around 17:30 on the same day; (b) on the same page, approximately 30 members, including members of the club, reporters, and relevant public officials, of the same party; and (c) accordingly,

h. The victim publicly insultingd the victim by stating this year, and in addition, “the victim”.

2. Defendant A

A. The Defendant openly insulting the victim E by stating, at the same time, at the same time and place as the above Paragraph 1, that “I must control this land. I shall not see this water, and will be hyp,” thereby insulting the victim.

B. The Defendant, at the time, at the same time, and at the same place as the above paragraph (1) above, inflicted injury on the victim E (influence, 37 years of age) by tightly pushing the shoulder of the victim E twice in his hand, thereby causing approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of each fine

B. Defendant B: Article 311 of the Criminal Act; Selection of fine

1. Defendant A from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Defendants bearing litigation costs: Determination as to the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant B and the defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not have the victim's bath at the time.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, i.e., the defendant, who was the victim of G political party at the time, is against the position of the G party.

arrow