logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.04.15 2015고단303
업무방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 11, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 5 million in the Jeonju District Court for the crime of interference with business, etc. on November 13, 2013 to a fine of KRW 3.5 million in the same court as the crime of interference with business, and a fine of KRW 3 million in the same court on January 27, 2014 to a fine of KRW 3 million in the crime of interference with business, etc. on October 11, 2011, and completed the execution of the sentence on August 9, 201 after having been sentenced to imprisonment with labor for the crime of interference with business, etc. at the Jeonju District Court on August 14, 2014, and completed the execution of the sentence on December 31, 2014.

1. From January 1, 2015 to December 12:51 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) within the Jung-gu Seoul apartment management office in Jeonsi-gu Seoul Metropolitan City from around 12:29 to around 11, 2015, the Defendant, due to the unfavorable statement of the employees of the management office, made the victim D (the age 46), who was the head of the management office of the above apartment management office, was released from the control post; (b) thereby, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s management office duties by force by preventing the victims from performing apartment management duties, such as handling civil petitions related to the above apartment for about 23 minutes, thereby obstructing the victim’s management office duties by force.

Defendant continued to do so from that time on the same year.

2. From March 2, 200 to December 200, the victims suffered a disturbance by finding them about a total of 22 times, such as the list of crimes in the annexed list, and taking a bath, and preventing the victims from doing the above apartment management work, thereby obstructing the management office operation of the victims by force.

2. On January 22, 2015, the Defendant, around 14:30 on January 22, 2015, on the victim E (the 47-year-old employee) who was an employee of a waterproof company found to repair the rooftop of an apartment in the parking lot adjacent to the above C apartment management office, determined that “whether he/she will return to the apartment in why he/she is not an apartment resident. b)” and without any justifiable reason, the victim boardeds both arms.

arrow