beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. In fact, the Defendant’s defense counsel asserts to the effect that the fact-finding is erroneous as to the main text of the pleading from June 2, 2016 to the end of the second order of 2015 to the second order of 4270 and the second order of 5379 to the second order of 2015. However, the gist of the argument above is submitted after the expiration of the submission period for the reasons for appeal. As such, the reasons for appeal stated in the above summary of the argument are not stated in the reasoning for appeal submitted within the submission period for the reasons for appeal.
On the other hand, the contents of the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts subject to the adjudication of this Court shall be based on the Defendant’s statement of grounds for appeal submitted on March 21, 2016 within the submission period of the appeal and the Defendant’s statement of grounds for appeal submitted on April 18, 2016, and the Defendant’s defense counsel’s statement of grounds for appeal shall be supplemented within the scope of the appeal.
1) In order to purchase a mobile phone with the amount paid by the injured party, the Defendant: (a) received the cell phone of KRW 194,794,400 in total from November 21, 2014 to December 31, 2014; and (b) the victim received the cell phone of KRW 175 [135 (Reference Data submitted by the injured party to an investigation agency, 547,557, 553)], the victim received the cell phone of KRW 40 (the delivery date additionally confirmed by the Defendant); (c) the summary of the oral argument as of August 10, 2016 (A) and the summary of the statement of summary of the statement as of August 10, 2016; and (d) the victim should exclude KRW 404,3054,204,205,200 from the total amount of damage paid by the injured party to the mobile phone.
(2) The part of the Defendant against the victim H was aware that he received money from the victims E and did not recognize the victim H as a separate customer separate from the victim E, and thus, there was a separate intent to obtain money from the Defendant for the victim H.
shall not be deemed to exist.
(b) the portion of investment: