The judgment below

Each conviction shall be reversed.

The 2016 High Order 5347 High Order 2016 High Order 9161 High Order 201.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant (the document submitted after the lapse of the submission period of the grounds for appeal is deemed to be within the scope of supplement in case of supplement in case of the grounds for appeal) 1) misunderstanding of the facts as to the following facts: (a) 2016 Highest 2084 Highest 2016 Highest 300, highest 5347 Highest 2017 highest 307 highest 307 highest 307 highest 3071 (victim J), the Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that they denied and challenge the above facts while submitting the written grounds for appeal; (b) however, the Defendant and their defense counsel withdrawn each of the above arguments and acknowledged this part of the charges by stating the summary of the arguments made on March 6, 2018 at the second trial date of the trial.

② As to the 2016 Highest 2390 case (victim AH), the Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that they denied and challenge the submission of a written reason for appeal. However, at the fourth trial date of the first trial, the Defendant and the defense counsel withdrawn the above argument and acknowledged this part of the facts charged.

A) As to the fraud of the crime No. 2 (victim AA) among the 2016 Highest 2084 cases, the victim was well aware of the progress of the project for constructing a new urban-type housing (hereinafter “sale project in this case”) and the 11th urban-type housing unit, which was promoted by the Defendant, and only was born in the process of the project, and did not deceiving the victim.

B) As to the 2016 Highest 5089 case (victim AK), the victim was aware of the fact that the instant sales business promoted by the Defendant was in the preparatory stage, and only was born during the process of the business, and the Defendant did not deceiving the victim.

C) As to the 2016 Highest 5778 case (victim AW), the Defendant did not borrow money from the damaged person, but received money for the purpose of introduction, it does not mean that the Defendant deceiving the injured person and defraud it.

D) As to the 2016 Highest 9161 case (victim AO), the Defendant.