logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.06.18 2020고단639
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 14, 2010, the defendant was sentenced to a summary order of a fine of one million won at the Suwon District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the criminal records of the same kind are one time.

On December 7, 2019, at around 23:50, the Defendant driven B vehicles under the influence of alcohol with approximately 1k alcohol concentration of 0.257% from the section of approximately 1k to the road near the same time point 3-3, 132-6, in the same time point, from the street near the Gyeonggi Cropic Scopic Scopic Scopic Scopic Disease Zone.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports (former and report on confirmation), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing summary orders;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) a criminal defendant committed a second offense despite the fact that he/she had been punished once due to drunk driving; (b) a blood alcohol concentration is very high; and (c) a traffic accident is likely to occur; (d) a criminal defendant is recognized and seriously reflects the criminal act; (e) a traffic accident does not occur; and (e) a criminal record of a fine of 2010, which is the previous offense of a drinking line, is the criminal record of a fine of 2010, which is favorable to the criminal defendant; and (e) a criminal record has no previous offense thereafter, shall be determined as per Disposition by taking account

arrow