logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.07.23 2020고단1553
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 13 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On December 4, 2017, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million by the Suwon District Court for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

On February 2, 2020, at around 06:50, the Defendant driven D QM5 car with approximately 2.5 kilometers alcohol concentration 0.110% under the influence of alcohol from the section of approximately 2.5 kilometers to the roads in the “C half-month” located in the same city from the roads near the ward station located in the Ssisisisidong.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal records, previous records of disposition and report on the results thereof, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning summary order;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the Defendant committed a second offense despite the fact that the Defendant had been punished once due to drunk driving; (b) the fact that the blood alcohol level was not lower than that of the Defendant; (c) the Defendant recognized and reflected the Defendant’s crime; (d) the Defendant did not have any traffic accident; (c) the previous offense is a criminal record of a fine; and (d) the fact that the Defendant had no particular criminal record; and (e) supporting his family members, etc., are considered as favorable to the Defendant; and (e) the judgment is rendered as per the Disposition, taking into account

arrow