logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.01.23 2014고단7202
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 19, 2014, the injured defendant: (a) around 22:35 on December 19, 2014, the Defendant: (b) within a taxi for F-Wing Transport Business in the operation of the victim E (the 49-year-old) drive, and at the destination, the injured Defendant: (c) was the victim, who was in arrival at the destination, saying, “the victim was frightening so that he would have done a taxi for business purpose; (d)” but the victim refused to “the frightening so that she would do a taxi for business purpose; (e) the victim’s head was 3 times by hand; and (e) the victim continued to drive the said taxi and sustained at around 22:37 on the same day, the victim’s shoulder, fright, etc. was 19 times by hand on the part of the victim’s shoulder, fright, etc.

As a result, the defendant injured the victim of about 14 days of treatment and damaged the character of the part of the neck that is not known in detail.

2 On December 20, 2014, at around 01:07, at the criminal team office of the Suwon-nam Police Station located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 52, the scraper damaged public goods: (a) listened to the horses that are being caused by the atmosphere from the head of H border belonging to the above police station; and (b) dump (75cm X 176cm in length) of glass windows located adjacent to the detention cell (aro 75cm in length 176cm in length) located adjacent to the detention cell without any reason during the atmosphere, and broken up by humping the windows, such as destroying the hump (aro 75cm in length X 176cm in length, 176cm in length), the repair cost, such as destroying the 135,000,000 won at the repair cost, which is a public goods managed by the Suwon-nam Police Station.

3. At the date, time, and place specified in Paragraph 2, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties in relation to the suppression of and investigation into crimes by assaulting the date, time, and place of the performance of official duties, such as: (a) the said I (the age of 48) reported that the Defendant would damage the glass and impulse; and (b) laying down the window to prevent the Defendant from harming any defect; (c) marking the drinking in the window; (d) marking the Defendant’s arms; and (e) cutting the Defendant’s arms into the Defendant’s arms, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police officer against E, J, and I.

arrow