The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is engaged in driving of Calglass and balglass.

On April 5, 2013, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on April 20:13, and was straighted in the direction of irrigation on the side of Song-ri in accordance with the first two-lane prior to the "Bilateral Automobile Service Center" located in the south of Yang-gu, Gangwon-do.

However, since the place is where the center line of yellow-ray is installed, in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely drive the car with the driver's duty of care.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got off the front door and the rear part of the E-learning Motor Vehicle that was driven by the victim D(50 years of age) who was on the opposite direction due to the negligence of driving the center line.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained salt and tensions of the bones of wood, which requires medical treatment for about three weeks, and at the same time, avoided repair costs, such as the front door of the driver’s seat of the said vehicle, and escaped without immediately stopping the said vehicle to take measures, such as aiding the victim, even though it damages the said vehicle’s repair costs to the extent of KRW 905,318.

2. On June 20, 2013, at the time of the first investigation by the investigation agency, the Defendant: (a) was found to have been aware that, in the course of the instant trial, at the time of the instant trial, the Defendant was at the time when the Defendant was found to have been engaged in the house repair and returned home in the house of Gangwon-gu, Yangwon-gun, Yangwon-gun, Yangwon-gun, and the Defendant was at the location indicated in the facts charged, and the Defendant was at the location indicated in the facts charged, and that the Defendant was at the time of the instant trial, not at the time of the instant trial but at the time when the Defendant was at the time engaged in the studio and gate construction in Yangwon-

Therefore, the statement made by the investigative agency is a statement made by the defendant by mistake, and the defendant has paid the accident of this case.