Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 2029"

1. The Defendant, at around 20:40 on August 29, 2016, on the street in front of “D promptly” in Jeju, the Defendant: (a) had the victim’s vehicle parked in the opposite direction while driving Ebeer or the vehicle; (b) had the victim’s vehicle followed by the victim’s vehicle; (c) discovered the victim’s F who was seated in the driver’s seat; (d) discovered the victim’s vehicle; and (e) caused the victim’s H, F’s Ha, F’s wife I, and C with the said rocketing vehicle, and destroyed the 30,000 won of the victim’s rocketing or other car owned by the victim by launchinging the driver’s seat of the said rocketing vehicle; and (e) caused the victim’s mobile phones to take off the cell phone.

The victim H caused the damage of 60,000 smartphones in the market value of 9.50,000 won by reducing the defects in reporting to the police and destroying the liquidization on the floor of the seed.

"2016 Highest 2743"

2. On August 29, 2016, the Defendant, on the ground that, at the same time as K in the city of Jeju on August 29, 2016, the Defendant would have been parked in the FF on the ground that the Defendant would have got a parked vehicle while driving the Ebeer or vehicle under the influence of drinking.

Therefore, the Jeju Provincial Office Lbox Ma, which was called after receiving a report 112, confirms that the driver was parked in the road while driving the vehicle from the above F, etc., and listens to the statement that the defendant was walking after the contact accident while driving the vehicle from the above F, etc., and was driven under the influence of alcohol by the defendant, such as smelling and snicking on the face.

There are reasonable grounds to determine a person, the same day, 21:20 on the same day, 21:33 on the same day, and 21:44 on the same day, the defendant demanded the defendant to respond to the measurement of drinking by inserting the whole breath of drinking on three occasions.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's drinking test without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 2029"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1.F, I, and H, respectively.