Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.
Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On November 30, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 9, 2018.
C is a person who sells or arranges used cars in Gyeonggi D Trading Complex, and the defendant is a person who sells or arranges used cars in Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan building F.
In collusion with C on June 2, 2017, at around 13:50 on June 2, 2017, the Defendant deducted one of the EU business parts equivalent to KRW 60,000,00 from the market price of the coo vehicle in order to show that the coo vehicle cannot be sold because the coo vehicle is broken to the J managed by the I to his nameless customers.
In addition, it was destroyed by the methods such as preventing the walking of the city.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of each police officer against C or K;
1. Investigation report (Securing and analyzing CCTV image data for committing a crime), and organization of CCTV photographs;
1. Statement made to I by the police;
1. Previous convictions: Inquiry about criminal history, the Incheon District Court 2017 High Order 1462 High Order, the results of the case search, and the application of statutes governing judgment;
1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime and Article 366 of the choice of punishment;
1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The sentence identical to the disposition shall be imposed in consideration of the following: (a) the value of the part that the Defendant deducted for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was relatively small; and (b) the sentence would not have been significantly changed even when the judgment was rendered together with the finalized fraud, etc.
Parts of innocence
1. The Defendant and C in collusion with the Defendant on June 2, 2017: (a) around 13:50 on June 2, 2017, sold oos vehicle at KRW 6 million to the J managed by I for a non-personal victim in name at “H of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City G Automobile Trading Complex”.
In the words, the above vehicles were shown.
However, if the injured party wants to purchase the above coos vehicle, the Defendants deducted the ECU business from the vehicle.
(v) the foregoing vehicle is starting.