beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 12, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) at the Suwon Flag Flag method, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on March 19, 2009. On June 15, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny of intrusion upon residence at night and became final and conclusive on February 28, 2013.
On December 27, 2011, the Defendant and C filed an application for a loan to the person in charge of the Defendant’s modern capital scooding business from the “F” located in the E-motor vehicle trading complex located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, for a loan of KRW 1830,000,000,000 for the loan, KRW 36 months for the loan period, KRW 755,966 for the monthly payment, and KRW 355,000 for the debtor C.
However, at the time, C was actually in possession of Cub vehicles and did not have the intent and ability to operate the Cub vehicles, and I did not have the intent and ability to repay the above loan, and the defendant also was aware of such circumstances to C to receive the loan brokerage fee.
Nevertheless, the Defendant and C conspired to operate the above coo vehicle in fact, and, as such, by deceiving a person in charge of the work of the victim's modern capitalization (ju) as if he would actually repay the above loans, and by receiving 18.3 million won from the person in charge of the work of the victim's modern capitalization on the same day as a loan for the purchase of cars, they acquired it by deceiving.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement C in the second public trial protocol;
1. The legal statement of the witness C;
1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C by the prosecution;
1. A complaint and loan-related documents;
1. Before the ruling: The result of the prisoner search, investigation report (Attachment A of the suspect's judgment) (According to the consistent statement of C, it is recognized that the defendant's location cannot be known until now to another person after acquiring the loan of this case. Thus, the defendant's loan is extended.