1. Of the instant lawsuits, the respective claims of Plaintiffs A and C, D, E, F, and G shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff B, an incorporated association.

Basic Facts

The defendant, such as the status of the parties, is the Child Care Association established pursuant to Article 53 (1) of the Infant Care Act for the smooth promotion of infant care services, the balanced development of child care centers, the exchange of information among child care centers, and

Under Article 53(2) of the Infant Care Act and each subparagraph of Article 41(2) of the Enforcement Rule of the Infant Care Act, the Defendant has subcommittees by type of child care centers in order to efficiently perform their duties. Article 10 of the Infant Care Act stipulates the types of child care centers by dividing them into national and public child care centers, social welfare corporations, corporations and organizations, child care centers, workplace child care centers, home care centers, cooperative child care centers, cooperative child care centers, and private child care centers, and the “I” (hereinafter referred to as “I”) is the subcommittee on the “social Welfare Child Care Centers” under Article 41(2)2

With respect to “I” under the defendant’s jurisdiction under the Infant Care Act, the plaintiff A and the plaintiff’s corporate association B (the representative of the plaintiff A, hereinafter “the plaintiff’s committee”) continue to be in the position of the plaintiff committee since its establishment on March 30, 2017, and the defendant continued to act as the name “M” for the distinction between the plaintiff committee and the former committee (hereinafter “former committee”). After approval, the plaintiff committee was approved after disciplinary action against the (Gu) committee to be considered below, and the committee is approved again after withdrawal of the above disciplinary action.

The defendant has a City/Do federation in accordance with Article 34 below.

Plaintiff

C, D, E, F, and G are the representatives or presidents of K Child Care Centers.

As to the “City/Do Federation” under the Defendant’s articles of association, the Defendant denied its status according to a disciplinary action against the “J Federation” (hereinafter referred to as the “J Federation”), which is deemed below.