A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, around 15:00 on December 5, 2013, 15:0, at the Fluri City, Inc., Ltd., Ltd., a Flater D victim E operated by Thailand, destroyed and damaged a credit cooperative that had been prepared in advance by taking advantage of the gap in the flick, and then stolen the amount of USD 52,660 ($ 56,000,000) within that limit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act in the suspended sentence is likely to be repaid the remaining amount of damage (five million won) due to a theft crime group, theft (type 4), special aggravation area of general property, imprisonment with prison labor for ten months from June to six years (Pronouncement of sentence), imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six years from the suspension of execution, and imprisonment with prison labor for not less than five years, and imprisonment with prison labor for a definite weapon that has no past record of criminal punishment other than five times in the suspended sentence, and a theft of large cash after destroying the imprisonment without prison labor and destroying it, which is highly bad in the legal form of crime, and a theft of large cash at a speed higher than the victim's repayment agreement;