logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.12.10 2014가단37553
건물명도등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Out of the first floor of the real estate in the attached list, the unit, (b) c. B. B. B. B., c. 1.

Reasons

On November 18, 201, the Plaintiff leased the leased deposit of KRW 10,00,000, monthly rent of KRW 1,210,000 (including value-added tax of KRW 110,00), and the period from December 6, 201 to December 6, 2012, the lease contract was renewed. The Defendant, on February 2, 2013 to July 2014, to KRW 21,780,000 (=1,210,000) connected each point in order to the Defendant, i.e., the leased deposit, and KRW 10,210,000,00 (including value-added tax of KRW 110,00) connected each point in the 1st floor of the real estate listed in the attached list x the Defendant’s submission of the lease contract to the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff did not have any dispute over the overdue interest between the parties.

According to the above facts, since the lease contract has been terminated, the defendant ordered the plaintiff to order the building of this case, which is the object of the lease, and paid 1,780,000 won (=21,780,000 won - 10,000 won) remaining after deducting the deposit for lease from the rent in arrears from February 2, 2013 to July 2014, and as requested by the plaintiff, there is a duty to pay the rent and unjust enrichment equivalent to the rate of 1,210,000 won per month from August 16, 2014 to the completion date of the above name.

If so, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable and acceptable.

arrow