Text
1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance is revoked.
The plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendant shall be dismissed.
2. The plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The status of the parties is a branch church belonging to the CEM General Assembly of Religious Organizations (integrated) (hereinafter “General Assembly”) established on January 4, 1976. The plaintiff is the defendant's leave of absence, and B is the defendant's leave of absence, and B is the defendant's delegated pastor from August 4, 2006 to the defendant's leave of absence.
B. Around August 2016, the Plaintiff recommended B, along with F, etc., to resign from the Defendant’s position as a delegated pastor (presidential officer) by reason of the Defendant’s reduction of teaching staff and his neglect of duties. (2) On August 28, 2016, the Defendant held a regular meeting on a regular basis and made a resolution to recommend B, and notified B, on the ground that B, was not erroneous for the resignation at the meeting held on September 11, 2016, and the Plaintiff rejected B’s resignation on the ground that there was no error to make it possible to resign from the meeting held on September 11, 2016.
3) On September 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) held a party meeting to the EEU to which the Defendant belongs; (b) decided to request that the president of the party branch in charge of the conference and resolution on the resignation of B pastors on behalf of the Defendant’s party pastor B; (c) the Defendant held a party meeting on October 16, 2016 and discussed the resignation of B pastors on September 25, 2016; and (d) discussed the resignation of B pastors as the presiding agent of the J pastors appointed as the president of the party branch in accordance with the resolution of the party branch on September 25, 2016; and (c) decided to resign on October 23, 2016 on October 23, 2016, on the ground that the outcome of the reply to B pastors was deemed inappropriate, pursuant to Articles 9(9) and 11(2) of the Defendant’s Articles of incorporation.
(hereinafter “instant resignation resolution”). C.
On December 11, 2016, when the plaintiff et al. passed a resolution to leave the religious order of the defendant Removal Association, the defendant Removal Association, which was held on December 11, 2016, decided to withdraw from the C religious organization and ENom Union (hereinafter "the resolution of this case") and on December 22, 2016, publicly announced the withdrawal resolution of this case to the Korea Press.
Provisions related to the general assembly constitution and the defendant's articles of incorporation concerning this case are as shown in the attached Form.
recognized.