A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 2, 2017, the Defendant was a person who actually operated “F gas station” in Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Group E, and was supplied with oil, etc. stolen from oil pipelines from I and J at H coffee stores located in Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Group G at a price below 12-15% of the market price during the market.

Accordingly, from February 2, 2017 to March 2017, the Defendant brought 3,000 liter oil from oil pipelines to the vegetable factory owned by the Defendant with the knowledge that oil from oil pipelines was stolen from oil pipelines using oil facilities by I,J, etc., and sold the oil transported by I, J, etc. to the above vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable, in the budget of the Chungcheongnam-gun budget, after he was carrying 3,00 liter oil from oil tanks to the above vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable, in which oil tanks are loaded with oil tanks, the Defendant brought the oil to the above vegetable storage tank operated by the Defendant, and sold it to the customers who found in the above vegetable vegetable vegetable.

As a result, the Defendant acquired stolen goods by purchasing a total amount of KRW 24,500,000 in a total of KRW 24,50,000 even though he/she was aware that he/she is a stolen goods during the above period.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. To state the witness I and each part of the J in the second public trial records;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect by the prosecution against I and J;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel of each police statement regarding I

1. He was aware of the summary of the assertion as oil without oil, and did not know that it is a stolen oil.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, it can be recognized that the defendant acquired pro-friendly oil from the oil pipelines from J, etc. while aware or aware of the fact that the defendant was a stolen article or stolen it.

A. The Defendant is a prosecutor’s office on May 14, 2018.