1. The defendant on Nov. 1, 1969 against each of the lands listed in the separate sheet to the plaintiffs.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. As to each of the lands listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the lands of this case”), the relevant land research division shall be 1911. (Paz. 44 years)

3.23.H residing in Gyeonggi-gun G is registered as the owner.

B. On November 10, 1969, the Defendant completed each of the registrations of initial ownership (hereinafter “each of the registrations of initial ownership”) on each of the instant lands as indicated in the order.

C. Around September 25, 1953, H, the Plaintiffs’ preference, resided in the Gyeonggiwon-gun I with his permanent domicile, and died on or around September 25, 1953, and upon his death, J independently succeeded to H’s property. Around June 2, 1974, J died and jointly succeeded to K, L, M, and N’s property.

Since then, after the death of K on March 14, 1981, the Plaintiff A, B, and C jointly succeeded to K with O, P, and Q. After the death of the O on January 2, 2015, the Plaintiff A, B, and C jointly succeeded to the property of the Plaintiff A, B, and C. On the other hand, the Plaintiff D, E, and F died on October 30, 1980, and the Plaintiff D, E, and F jointly succeeded to N’s property with R.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, Gap evidence No. 1, 2, and Gap evidence No. 7, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination:

A. First of all, the determination as to the cause of the claim is based on the following circumstances: H, the name of the circumstances of each land of this case, and H, the plaintiffs’ preference, are the same as the same person; the facts acknowledged earlier; and the fact-finding with respect to the head of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the court of this case’s fact-finding with respect to the head of Suwon-si, the overall purport of the arguments as follows: H and the plaintiffs’ preference are the same in Korean and Chinese names; H, the address of the circumstance-holder, “K-gun,” the address of H, the name of the situation-holder, “K-gun, the Gyeonggi-gu, the Gyeonggi-gu, the address of the plaintiffs, corresponds to “Y-gu, the Gyeonggi-gu, the Gyeonggi-gu, the Gyeonggi-gu, the address of H, the plaintiffs’ preference and the Dong-gu, the plaintiffs’ prior to the fact-finding of each land of this case.