logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.06.26 2014고단1603 (1)
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

B was established for the purpose of real estate development and sale in lots as the chairperson of C (hereinafter referred to as “C”), and D was in charge of attracting investment as the representative director of the above company, and the defendant was in charge of attracting investment as the adviser and the chairperson of the above company, and E was in charge of all affairs by assisting D as the representative director as the former director of the above company.

Defendant, B, D, and E, in the name of C, failed to carry out a new apartment construction project for the Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, 16,505 forest land owned by the F Religious Organization G Committee, with a view to acquiring money and valuables by approaching the victim J (L, 47 years old).

On September 30, 2009, the defendant, B, D, and E introduced the victim from the mutual infinite restaurant located in the Namdong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju to the introduction of the defendant on September 30, 2009, and provided the victim with KRW 120 million including interest until October 31, 2009, if the victim borrowed KRW 100 million to require the relocation cost of the cemetery.

Notarial acts will also be enforced.

The apartment site end-down land remains more, and it is intended to help it conduct the gas station and the field restaurant business at all times.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, in addition to the issuance of a letter of intent to sell the prospective project site by the F Religious G Committee for the lack of special assets in C, the cemetery 1,600 housing site located within the prospective project site was not concluded, and the project site was designated as a preserved green area, so it was impossible to develop the law in the context of designating the prospective project site as a preserved green area, and there was no possibility of conversion into the residential area in the future. In addition, the Defendant, B, D, and E also borrowed the money from the damaged person due to the lack of special assets, the principal and agreed interest.

arrow