A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in the business of driving freight vehicles Bribe.

On November 2, 2015, the Defendant driven the foregoing cargo while under the influence of alcohol 0.230% during blood transfusions, and driven the D cafeteria in front of the C cafeteria, and driven it from the friend side of funeral service.

At the same time, the coast was parked along the side of the road as a side road, and the vehicle driven in the opposite direction was stopped and stopped. In such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely, such as accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes according to the traffic conditions of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not change back to the post-maid fishing, and was at the same time stopped from the negligence of starting as it is.

E-Drivings conflict with the front part of the vehicle of the defendant, the front part of the FN bus on the right side of the bus.

After all, the defendant damaged the above bus owned by the high-speed tourism corporation of the victim Geum River by negligence in the course of the above business to the extent of the repair cost of KRW 963,301.

2. On November 2, 2015, the Defendant driving a cargo vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.230% alcohol level from the 300-meter section of the blood alcohol level to the place of accident described in paragraph (1) around 17:37 on the same day from the 163 meta-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri

3. He/she shall be prohibited from operating any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation;

Nevertheless, the defendant, as the owner of the above B Ribe, operated the above cargo vehicle which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement to E;