1. The defendant,

A. As to KRW 112,778,00 among Plaintiff A and KRW 112,778,00 among them, the amount of KRW 114,86,00 shall be from December 20, 2016, and KRW 2,108.

1. In fact, the following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged by comprehensively considering the following: Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3-3, Gap evidence Nos. 4-1, 2, 5-1, 5-3, Gap evidence Nos. 6-8, and the whole purport of the pleadings.

On October 1, 2004, the Korea National Housing Corporation (hereinafter “Defendant”) agreed to jointly implement the projects aimed at the construction of administrative center and national rental housing in the area, including the E-dong, Fdong, Gdong, Gdong, and Hadong-dong, Sungnam-si, Hanam-si, Hanam-si, Hanam-si, and the construction of national rental housing, etc., and the Minister of Construction and Transportation, upon the Defendant’s request, designated the Defendant as the project implementer by the JJ publicly notified of the Ministry of Construction and Transportation on June 26, 2006.

B. Since then, pursuant to Article 26 of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects (hereinafter “Public Works Act”), the Defendant, as a national rental housing project implementer, has conducted procedures for consultation with the Plaintiff, the owner of the land in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul-si, through consultation. As to the size of 560 square meters of the land in Seongdong-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, the Defendant conducted procedures for consultation with the Plaintiff B and C, the co-owners of shares in

C. The Defendant assessed the compensation by appraising KRW 76,666 per 1 square meter on the premise that the said L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based land was actually used as “road”, and KRW 457,00 per 1 square meter on the premise that the said land was actually used as “electric field”. However, as to the remaining 527 square meters (hereinafter “instant one land”), the Defendant assessed the compensation by appraising KRW 243,00 per 1 square meter on the premise that the land was actually used as “forest,” and calculated the compensation by appraising KRW 560 square meters on the premise that the said land was actually used as “forest.”