1. The Defendants shall state on the Plaintiff the term “building (leased) occupied by the Defendant” in the attached Table 1 list.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff leased the pertinent building as stated in the “building (leased) object” in the attached Table 1 list to the Defendants as “contract period,” “lease deposit,” and “lease deposit,” respectively, in the attached Table 1 list.

According to a lease agreement concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendants, the lessor may terminate the lease agreement if the lessee has been in arrears for more than three consecutive months (Article 10(1) of the General Conditions of the contract). The lessor may renew the lease agreement on a two-year basis, where the lessee is qualified to move into national rental housing (such as a non-house owner, property ownership, income, and requirements for restricting the scale of house on a single-household basis).

(6) Article 1(1)(b) of the Special Conditions for Contracts.

After the conclusion of the lease agreement with the Plaintiff, Defendant A lost the eligibility for occupancy as prescribed by the lease agreement.

The remaining Defendants, other than Defendant A, did not delay that they are the difference of each corresponding month stated in the “month in Arrears” column in attached Table 2.

C. The Plaintiff notified the Defendants of the termination of the lease agreement on the ground that the service of the duplicate of the complaint of this case exceeded the assets and did not pay rent.

【Defendant A, D, E, F, H, I, and K: Each confession judgment (Article 208(3)2, and Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act) rendered by each service by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. The assertion and judgment

A. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the lease agreement between the plaintiff and the defendants was lawfully terminated by the plaintiff's notice of termination on the ground that the lease agreement exceeds the asset in the case of defendant A, and the remaining defendants did not pay rent.

Therefore, the Defendants fall under the term “building (object of lease) possessed by the Defendant” in the attached Table 1 list to the Plaintiff.