1. Attached Table 1 to the Plaintiff states the list of real estate possessed by the Defendant and the terms of the lease agreement.

【Claims against Defendant A, B, C, and D】

1. The Plaintiff entered into each lease agreement with Defendant A, B, C, and D, such as the list of real estate held by the Defendant and the terms and conditions of the lease agreement. The Defendants failed to pay for the difference as stated in the attached Form 2 “The grounds for the cancellation of the lease agreement”.

The plaintiff shall terminate each of the above lease agreements by serving a duplicate of the complaint of this case, and seek the return of the leased object.

2. Judgment by public notice on the part of claims against Defendant A, B, or D (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

3. Judgment by deeming the part of the claim against Defendant C as a confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act) (Article 208(3) of the Civil Procedure Act)

1. On October 7, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant E with the same content as that of Defendant E, “the list of real estate held by the Defendant and the terms of the lease agreement,” and Defendant E, as stated in the attached Table 2, “the monthly installments by each Defendant and the grounds for termination of the contract”, the fact that Defendant E delayed payment of monthly rent under the lease agreement, as stated in the attached Table 2, is either a dispute between the parties, or a dispute between the parties, and the purport of the entire pleadings, can be acknowledged by taking into account the entire arguments as a whole.

The fact that the Plaintiff, on September 2, 2015, reached Defendant E on September 2, 2015, containing the content that the said lease contract is terminated on the grounds of the delinquency in payment of monthly rent for at least two years by Defendant E, is apparent in the record.

Therefore, Defendant E is obligated to deliver to the Plaintiff the real estate possessed by Defendant E on the list of real estate held by the Defendant and the terms of the lease agreement as stated in the attached Table 1.

2. The judgment of Defendant E on Defendant E’s assertion is a basic livelihood recipient.