1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a)the third-party general steel structure and other roof, 106 above ground 106, e.g., e., e., g., e.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 29, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) leased the instant lease agreement to the Defendant on August 29, 201; (b) the deposit amount of KRW 70 million for a factory of KRW 1483.5 square meters on 106 ground (hereinafter “three-dimensional factory building”) on the 9th day of each month; and (c) the lease period of KRW 70 million from September 9, 2012 to September 8, 2013 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). Since the Plaintiff and the Defendant had renewed the instant lease agreement under the same conditions, the Defendant renewed the lease agreement from 0.7 on September 9, 2015 to 0.7 on the 20.6th day of the building on the ground of KRW 15,00,000,000 for KRW 7,000,000 on the 20-dong factory from September 1, 2015 to September 8, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, 2, Eul evidence 1-4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. 1) The determination on the claim for delivery of three factory buildings is based on the facts of the above recognition as to the ground for the claim (the argument that the term of the instant lease agreement expires and the primary argument). Thus, the instant lease agreement is terminated on September 8, 2016, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is obligated to deliver three factory buildings to the Plaintiff. 2) The Defendant’s determination on the Defendant’s claim for implied renewal is asserted that the instant lease agreement was implicitly renewed prior to the expiration date of the instant lease agreement, and thus, the Defendant did not express the Plaintiff’s intent to refuse renewal.

(2) The term of lease.