1. The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) indicated the attached Form 1 among the land for factory C,221 square meters in Namyang-si from the Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant (Counterclaim Defendant).

1. The following facts can be acknowledged, without dispute between the parties, by comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in each video of Gap evidence No. 1, evidence No. 3, evidence No. 6-1, evidence No. 7, evidence No. 10, evidence No. 10, and evidence No. 5-1 through No. 11, and evidence No. 8-1 through No. 8-8, and the video of Eul evidence No. 2-1 through No. 19, evidence No. 19, and each of the items and images No. 20 are insufficient to reverse this.

The Defendant is the owner of each of the instant factories (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant factories”) with four factory buildings with an area of 154 square meters or more (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant factories”) on the Namyang-si City, Namyang-si, 321 square meters of land for factory (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”) and the above above ground.

B. On October 1, 2006, the Plaintiff: (a) concluded a lease agreement between the Defendant on October 1, 2006, setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 30,000,000 for the instant building and its site; (b) KRW 1.6 million for the tea; and (c) from October 27, 2006 to October 26, 2008 for the term of lease; and (d) occupied and used the instant building and its site (e.g., 50 square meters) between the Defendant on February 26, 201; and (b) concluded a lease agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on February 26, 201, the lease agreement between February 26, 2011 to January 26, 2012 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

(2) The Plaintiff concluded a contract with the head of the household to “a building (a steel framed, container 3 units) shall be restored to its original location after removal at the time of the subsequent removal.” (2) Accordingly, the Plaintiff engaged in metal structure, design, experience facilities manufacturing and sales business, etc. in the leased object.

C. From September 2006 to October 2006, the Defendant installed the Defendant’s retaining wall, etc., the height of 4 meters at the boundary line of 2,639 square meters of the instant land and D religious site.