A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 17:30 on October 8, 2017, the Defendant recommended the Defendant to return home on the front side of the Broadcasting and Communications University located in 272, the National Assembly of Yangcheon-gu, Seoul National Assembly, upon receiving a report from the Defendant, to 112 that the Defendant s/he s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ ss/

Mahman, “Cr. Cr. S. S. S. S.N.

Before the 2nd century, “A” was expressed as “A,” the breath’s breath’s breath’s breath’s breath, the body was tightly sealed, and the boomed, and the above breath’s breath’s breath’s breath’s breath’s breath’s body was boomed three times.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the handling of reports and the maintenance of order by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement law to D or C

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order [Scope of Recommendation] The following two shall be taken into consideration: (a) the basic area (six months to one year and six months) (special mitigation) [where the degree of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, or obstruction of official duties is minor; (b) the number of damaged public officials is minor; (c) the determination of sentence] the nature of crimes such as assaulting the police officers in the course of performing official duties; but (d) there are no favorable circumstances such as confession and rebuttal, and the same kind of offense and fine, which are more favorable than the previous offense and fine.