A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 8. 24. 17:45 경 안산시 단원구 B에서 술에 취하여, 순찰 업무를 마치고 순찰차에 탑승하려는 안산 단원 경찰서 C 파출소 소속 경찰관들을 발견하고 “ 씨 발, 나 집까지 태워 줘, 왜 안 태워 줘! 씨 발 새끼들!” 이라고 욕설을 하며 순찰차의 조수석 문을 강제로 열려고 하였으나 위 소속 순경 D로부터 제지 당하자 화가 나, 오른 주먹으로 위 순경 D의 낭 심 부위를 1회 가격하고, 이를 막으려 던 위 소속 순경 E의 낭 심 부위를 1회 가격하였다.

Defendant 1 continued to be a police officer F. F. M. M. M. M. F. M. F.

Degressive required for returning home.

Although he was aware of the fact that he was ", she was satisf of F's chest part of F's chest at one time, and she was a back-up part of E's back-up part of E's back-up part, which was next to it.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of public duties of police officers on patrols of patrol officers D, F, and E, and protective measures for police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to F, E, or D;

1. G statements;

1. A damaged photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (verification of images taken by police officers);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act [the scope of punishment] is that there is no person who has committed a special sentencing [the person who has committed a crime in June to June] under the basic area (the person who has committed a crime in the course of performing official duties] [the decision of sentence] under the circumstances that are disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant committed a assault against the police in the course of performing official duties, the fact that there is a record of 22 times or more due to a crime related to violence, and the fact that the defendant is against the wrong, and the degree of damage to the police officers is relatively insignificant, etc., in the argument of this case.