A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 23:35 on September 12, 2014, attempted to board a bus for mountain transit within a bus terminal located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Masan-si, 267, but (b) provided that “ba bus shall not be driven by a bus” to the injured party B (the injured party (the injured party) who is an employee, who is aware of the fact that the bus had already started.

Therefore, the victim B, who had already started a mountain bus, was able to take the bath of “this fladles and dead at any time,” and used the fladles of the victim B at one time to fladize and flad and flad, and the victim C (the 44 years old) who was an employee of the full passenger who was reported next to this was flading the defendant, and assaulted the victim C’s fladles as soon as possible, by assaulting the victim C’s fladles.

2. On September 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) expressed that, within the bus terminal in Mansan-si, the Defendant was able to bring the fright to the 112 report that the Defendant carried the fright to the fright; and (b) stated that, in order for the fright to identify the situation of the case, the fright E, the fright of the Man-dong Police Station D District United by the Man-dong Police Station that was called out after receiving the 112 report that the Defendant carried the fright to the fright to the fright to the fright to the fright to the f

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers E in relation to the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to B, C, and E

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 136 (1) and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act (Scope of Recommendation): Type 1 (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties): Basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months): No person who has no special sentencing person (special sentencing person): The second crime (Scope of Recommendation): Violence 1 (General Violence).