Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the spouse B on or around 00:20, and (b) went home voluntarily according to the zone D located in the voice group of Chungcheongnam-gun; (c) the spouse B, who arrived at the said zone, was not punished against the Defendant; and (d) the spouse B, who was a police officer belonging to the zone B, went home again at the house located in the 2nd floor of Chungcheongnam-gun A, E, a police officer belonging to the zone; and (e) with the F’s aid, went home at the house located in the 2nd floor.

At around 02:05 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) was in front of the “H” restaurant operated by the Defendant on the said 1studio, and his spouse changed his mobile phone in the said cafeteria, and discarded it into the said cafeteria, and (b) when the Defendant wants to open the said cafeteria, the Defendant assault Fman with F shicking towards the said cafeteria.

The Defendant continued to gather the creams in the above restaurant while putting the clater B and E and F with the click, “I am scars, scars, B in the restaurant,” etc., and continued to gather the clicks in the above restaurant, and kept the mobile phone owned by B as a wall.

Therefore, while police officers and F notified that they would arrest a flagrant offender on suspicion of damage to the mobile phone owned by their spouse B, they committed assaulting E on one occasion by plucking or plucking off the defendant's arms, while they resisted and resisting, they committed assaulting police officers by breaking up the chin of E in the head-roman.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the handling of domestic violence cases and arrest of flagrant offenders.

2. Around 02:05 on June 19, 2016, the Defendant damaged a mobile phone equivalent to KRW 800,000 of the market price by setting off a cell phone owned by the victim B, who is his/her spouse, with walls, at the above H restaurant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to B, E, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police officers in charge of violence, photographs of parts of mobile phones, and photographs damaged by mobile phones;

1. Criminal facts;